Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Johnston v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Johnston
Defendant:
FCI Mcdowell Dental Service, Doc. Veronica Brown, Asst. Megan Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Christopher West v. Mark Emig, et al
as 22-3205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER H. WEST
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK EMIG and JEFFREY CAROTHERS
Traylor v. Carothers et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Adrian Traylor
Defendant:
Chandra Carothers and Mrs. C. Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ELY v. OFFICE OF THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 4:2019cv00273
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROTHERS, OFFICE OF THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN L. ELY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sustaita v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2019cv04150
Defendant:
Paula Young, . Carothers, . Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sustaita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Carver, et al
as 1:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Hunt
Defendant:
FCI McDowell, Mr. Johnson, P.A. William Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. Batson et al
as 4:2019cv04084
Plaintiff:
Cedric Ford
Defendant:
Lois Lindroff, Sgt. Batson, C/O Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buggs v. Lucas et al
as 1:2018cv00729
Plaintiff:
Marcus Buggs
Defendant:
Kelly Lucas, Chandra Carothers, Angela Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROMERO v. CAROTHERS et al
as 4:2018cv00043
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. CAROTHERS and CHARLES S. MURPHY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carothers v. Cook County Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv09026
Plaintiff:
Stanley Carothers
Defendant:
Cook County Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
