Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
Kory Clay v. Michael Bowersox, et al
as 12-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kory S. Clay
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Bowersox, Preston Cooper, Tamara Stell and others
LaVelle Searcy, et al v. Macomb County Jail, et al
as 11-2340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVELLE W. SEARCY
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WITHERSPOON, WILLIAM JOHNSON, SHANNON SEXTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MACOMB COUNTY JAIL, MARK A. HACKEL, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Garfield Lawson v. Michael Engelsgjerd, et al
as 11-1881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARFIELD LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ENGELSGJERD, M.D., R. LALONDE, ARUS/ARUM, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, ARUS/ARUM and others
Seals v. Scutt et al
as 2:2010cv15054
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Seals
Defendant:
Debra Scutt , B Gardon, B Clement and others
Clay v. Bowersox et al
as 6:2010cv03503
Plaintiff:
Kory S Clay
Defendant:
Michael Bowersox, Preston Cooper, Tamara Stell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruud v. Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv12204
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ruud
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Onuigbo, George J Pramstaller and others
MATHEWS v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2010cv00633
Defendant:
DR. RICHARD M. CARR, M.D., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, JOHN DALLAS and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON MATHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dupage v. Hackel et al
as 4:2010cv10868
Petitioner:
Robert Dupage
Respondent:
Mark A Hackel, FNU Ash, John Doe and others
Randy Haynes v. Keith Ivens, et al
as 10-1240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY M. HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH IVENS, JEFFREY STIEVE, JOHN DOES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
