Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff:
Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant:
S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alrelio Evans v. Tinerella, et al
as 23-1576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALRELIO EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER TINERELLA, in individual capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICER RUBLEY, in individual capacity, NURSE WEST, in individual capacity and others
Saquan Musgrove v. Correctional Officer Moore
as 22-7430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOORE and OFFICER A. JONES
MUSGROVE v. MOORE et al
as 1:2019cv00164
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOORE, SGT. WHICHARD and OFFICER A. JONES
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Musgrove v. Moore et al
as 5:2019ct03035
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Moore, Sgt. Whichard and Officer A. Jones
Plaintiff:
Saquan S. Musgrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lee v. Brown, et al
as 15-1256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
SGT. BROWN, Corrections Officer in his Individual and Official Capacities and CORIZON HEALTH INC, FKA PHS Correctional Healthcare
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
HENRY, Corrections Officer in her Individual and Official Capacities, FREDERICK ABELLOS, Deputy Warden in his Individual and Official Capacities, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOORE, in her Individual and Official Capacities and others
Rivera v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv09315
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rivera
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections, Tom Dart, Comandor Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newcome v. Stokes et al
as 5:2010ct03188
Plaintiff:
Dustin Karl Newcome
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Stokes and Correctional Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
