Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hervey v. Lief et al
as 4:2023cv04092
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Hervey
Defendant:
R Lief, Tyler Crouse, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. White et al
as 5:2021ct03313
Plaintiff:
Zane Johnson and Zane Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
David White, Kimberly C. Wynn and George W. Baysden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Scott et al
as 3:2021cv01182
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams
Defendant:
John Scott, Jeff Bullard, Craig Mansker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Beard et al
as 0:2021cv00049
Defendant:
T. Nicely, K. Boyles, J. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
John David White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stompingbear v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, John Rodgers, Marshall Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Department of Justice/Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Department of Justice/Bureau of Prisons, Ashland Federal Correctional Instutition and Allen Beard, Jr.
Plaintiff:
John David White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Ashland Federal Correctional Institution
as 0:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
John David White
Defendant:
Ashland Federal Correctional Instutition
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
