Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Daniel v. Fighter-Daniel et al
as 2:2024cv11218
Plaintiff:
Allen David Daniel
Defendant:
Teri Fighter-Daniel, M. Sorensen, Barber and others
Franco v. Thrush
as 1:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Adam Franco
Defendant:
Shawn Thrush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marilyn Eason v. Michael Casper, et al
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
MARILYN EASON
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. CASPER and RAYMOND FRANCO
LUKES v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
ISSAC JACIEL LUKES and ISAAC JACIEL LUKES
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, L. HAMBIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blacher v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2023cv01951
Plaintiff:
Marlon Jessie Blacher
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri, Pinellas County Board of Commissioners, Nurse Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Maricopa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2023cv01427
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Cole
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Paul Penzone, BM Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WELLS v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2023cv01289
Plaintiff:
QUANARDEL WELLS
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, MELISSA BAGIENSKI, FRANCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barzee v. Abdulla et al
as 7:2023cv02328
Plaintiff:
Saio Barzee
Defendant:
Sing Sing C.O. A.M. Abdulla, Sing Sing C.O. E. Torres, Sing Sing C.O. V. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JACKSON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REAGLE, CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Warden T. Allen, Doctor Michael Yeh, Nurse Patrick Gullien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
