Cases 1 - 10 of 189
Bralen Jordan v. Johnny Leonwicsy, et al
as 22-2832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNNY LEONWICSY, Captain, KENNETH DUGDALE, C. HORST and others
Bralen Jordan v. Johnny Leonwicsy, et al
as 22-2741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNNY LEONWICSY, Captain, KENNETH DUGDALE, C. HORST and others
Jordan v. Leonwicsy et al
as 3:2022cv50288
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
Johnny Leonwicsy, Kenneth Dugdale, C. Horst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01984
Defendant:
Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ramarize, Cruize and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Defendant:
. Ramarize, Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv01889
Plaintiff:
Lucio Ortiz-Contreras
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. , Harley Lappin , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2014cv00067
Defendant:
R. BASKERVILLE, BEAVER, J. BEIGHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Donald Jenkins v. Simmon
as 13-6656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD H. JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. SIMMONS, Food Service Administrator and MR. SIMON, Cook Forman
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARLEY LAPPIN, Director
David Zebrowski v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-60196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ZEBROWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, R E HOLT and others
Phillip Irving v. The GEO Group, Incorporated
as 13-6381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP AUBREY IRVING
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, JONATHAN MINER, Warden, DAVID FARMER, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
