Cases 1 - 10 of 314
LOPER v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv02480
Plaintiff:
WALTER LOPER
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, HOWARD HOLLAND, OFFICER WHITESIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELFERTY v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv02269
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. HELFERTY
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, ROBERT MASTJNAK, GEORGE ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor:
Kendra Feltner
Defendant:
Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branden Holland v. J. Chavarria, et al
as 24-10804
Plaintiff:
BRANDEN HOLLAND
Defendant:
J. CHAVARRIA and J. BASSILLO
Sellers v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Donnie Mack Sellers
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen, Kristy Cobban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. PENIX et al
as 5:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
PENIX, M BREWER and HEATH HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
HEATH HOLLAND and M BREWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabagua v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Cabagua
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett, Kevin Carr, J Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keenan v. Holland et al
as 3:2023cv50454
Plaintiff:
Jacob D. Keenan
Defendant:
Michael Holland, Phillip Schnider, Brandon Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Shew et al
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Brandon Neal Holland
Defendant:
Chris Shew, Jason Whitley and Shelby Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
