Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Brown v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Carvell Tony Brown
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Captain Walker, Lt. Corcino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 24-11273
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JOE NATHAN JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
KAY IVEY, JOHN Q. HAMM, TERRY RAYBON and others
Brent Jacoby v. John Hamm, et al
as 24-10574
Plaintiff:
BRENT JACOBY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN Q. HAMM, EASTERLING CF WARDEN and others
Holifield v. Hamm et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamar Holifield
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Dominiqic I. Curry
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Sheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Edward Lavar King
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Sheryl Price, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Cunningham and Dewayne Scott Cunningham
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, David Lamar, Lt. Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Biden et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jhamal Dwayne Crawford
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmore v. YesCare Corp. et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
George Washington Palmore
Defendant:
YesCare Corp., Tahir Siddiq, David Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borden v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Justin Katdeem Borden
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
