Cases 1 - 10 of 531
Gautier v. Harris
as 5:2024ct03215
Defendant:
Corporal Ally Harris
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Randall Gautier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Mindi Nurse, Dave Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LLOYD v. USA
as 2:2024cv00417
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
MARIO HOWARD LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley Boclair v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 24-2406
Defendant:
DAVID L. EVELSIZER, ROB JEFFREYS, Acting Director, ROBERT MUELLER, Southern Regional Director and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Stanley Boclair v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 24-2397
Defendant:
LLOYD HANNA, Dietary Manager, FRANK LAWRENCE, Former Warden, ROB JEFFREYS, Acting Director and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
ROWLISON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, MAJOR DURREGAR and others
Plaintiff:
LLOYD C. ROWLISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SURBHI
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. LEWIS
Defendant:
MD JANE SURBHI, NICOLE R. RAINES, SIDNEY C. ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Burnes and Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
