Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Caldwell v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv11178
Plaintiff:
Ramon Lovell Caldwell
Defendant:
Ryan, Mikat, Moriarty and others
Bryan Pollion v. Timothy Adesanya
as 24-1607
Plaintiff:
BRYAN LOVELL POLLION
Defendant:
TIMOTHY ADESANYA
Dawson v. Evans
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Lovell Dawson
Defendant:
Officer Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Glynn County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Lovell Dawson
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Glynn County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Lovell Dawson
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center and Officer Applegate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lovell v. East Oakland Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lovell, II
Defendant:
East Oakland Police Department, Highland Hospital, Alameda County, California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpe #153062 v. Tyson et al
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Lovell C. Sharpe #153062
Defendant:
Unknown Tyson and J. Winger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARTIS v. ALACHUA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
XAVIER LOVELL KEVON ARTIS and XAVIER LAVELL KEVON ARTIS
Defendant:
ALACHUA COUNTY JAIL, SERGEANT J WALLACE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER A SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colvin v. State of California et al
as 5:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Lovell Colvin
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollion v. Adesanya et al
as 3:2021cv03203
Plaintiff:
Bryan Lovell Pollion
Defendant:
Timothy Adesanya, Glen Austin, Stephanie Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
