Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Washington v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2023cv10063
Plaintiff:
Derrick Washington
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Superintendent Kenneway, Lieutenant Deschene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Calzada v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv05460
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Calzada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabaldon v City of Norfolk Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv10465
Plaintiff:
Frank Gabaldon
Defendant:
City of Norfolk Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pelton v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2020cv11705
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Massachusetts Department of Correction
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pelton, Sr
Bureau v. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2020cv11706
Defendant:
Department of Correction, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Real A. Bureau
Cullinan v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2020cv11466
Defendant:
Wellpath, Massachusetts Department of Correction, David Duarte and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan P Cullinan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2020cv00109
Defendant:
State of Alabama, United States of America Inc., State of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petit-Homme v. State of Massachusetts
as 1:2019cv11559
Defendant:
State of Massachusetts
Plaintiff:
Denver E Petit-Homme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. INDIANA SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEALS et al
as 2:2019cv00329
Defendant:
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS and INDIANA SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Emerge et al
as 1:2019cv11043
Defendant:
MPCH, Aubrey Graham, Common Purpose and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
