Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Taylor v. Ford et al
as 4:2023cv04133
Plaintiff:
Jamal Taylor
Defendant:
. Ford, K Johnson and . Mattingly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv02978
Plaintiff:
JAYME SMITH
Defendant:
COLTIN CLARK, PATTY CLOUSE, LIND L. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTSLAR et al v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
DELBERT S. GADDIS, III, AARON MATTINGLY, CODY FIELDS and others
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattingly v. Sneed et al
as 2:2020cv00622
Defendant:
CO Bryer Lynch, CO Robert Wooding, Sgt. Matthew Starcher and others
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Mattingly, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jointer v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2019cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jointer
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy, Timothy Moore, Lou Anna Red Corn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey Mattingly v. Sohail Khan, et al
as 18-12242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASEY MATTINGLY
Defendant - Appellee:
SOHAIL KHAN, P.A., LINDA RICHO, P.A., DANA BARNES and others
Casey Mattingly v. Duval County Jail, et al
as 18-11608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASEY MATTINGLY
Defendant - Appellee:
DUVAL COUNTY JAIL, SHANDS HOSPITAL, DEBRA BARNES, M.D. and others
Lunsford Heth v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Lunsford Heth
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Martinez, Assistant Warden Nearly, Correctional Officer Mattingly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Mattingly et al
as 3:2015cv01425
Plaintiff:
Andre L Horton
Defendant:
Don Mattingly, Gary Cothern, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory et al
as 1:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Francis A. Grandinetti
Defendant:
Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inverness Medical Company, J. Mattingly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
