Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gill v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden, FCC Coleman, Warden, USP Hazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Edwards v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv00815
Plaintiff:
Leellis Edwards
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Police Department and Oklahoma County Detention Center Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Warden, USP Hazelton et al
as 6:2021cv00416
Defendant:
United States Marshal Services, Jason A. Sickler, Health Services, USP Hazelton and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. FTC Oklahoma City Transfer Center
as 5:2020cv01037
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dillard
Defendant:
FTC Oklahoma City Transfer Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2019cv03173
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00010
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, KIMBERLY LEMONS, D. MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marricco Sykes v. Mr. Elliot, et al
as 11-3752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARRICCO A. SYKES
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. ELLIOT, CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS, WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE, Stockton, California and others
Sanchez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Pedro Luis Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, F.M.C. Rochester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
