Cases 1 - 10 of 14
TAYLOR v. INDIANAPOLIS POST OFFICE et al
as 1:2021cv02266
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS POST OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, WOLFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. AUSP-Thomson et al
as 3:2020cv50059
Defendant:
Medical Dept., B. Willmirth, Mailroom-R+D Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon DeShaun Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. POSTMASTER et al
as 2:2018cv01604
Defendant:
KEEFE, DAVID ANDERCHAK, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS, WITCRAFT RIDDLER and SHOOTER DUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN et al v. WAYNE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv00133
Plaintiff:
NOEL L. BROWN, SHERON A. CHAMBERS, DRYAH K. BROWN and others
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, P.S.P. HONESDALE BARRACKS, SHARON PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pizarro v. U.S. Post Office et al
as 1:2017cv04409
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office, Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. GEORGIA STATE OF et al
as 5:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
RODERICK FRANK FOSTER
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE OF, SAMUEL S OLENS, HOWARD Z SIMMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. GAILEY
as 3:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant:
MS. GAILEY, U.S. POST OFFICE and D.O.C. SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Ford et al
as 5:2014cv00572
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper
Defendant:
Ford, FCC-Coleman Med Fed Prison, U.S. Post Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Ford et al
as 3:2014cv01274
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper
Defendant:
Ford, FCC-Coleman Med Fed Prison, U.S. Post Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Medlin et al
as 3:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Gerald A. Davidson
Defendant:
FNU Medlin, FNU Quinn, Pat Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
