Cases 1 - 10 of 33
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. IRWIN et al
as 3:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY J. BLICHA, LT. S. KOPCHICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Lee et al
as 4:2023cv03660
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Defendant:
M. Lee, Hamner, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico v. Secretary of CDCR et al
as 5:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
Jorge Andrade Rico
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR, H. Mosley, R. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Verduzco v. Mickey Price, et al
as 23-15127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL VERDUZCO
Defendant / Appellee:
MICKEY PRICE, Chief Mental Health Psychologist, R. LIMON, Chief Psychologist, HANNAH E. BUSH and others
Barry Woods v. D. Hanson, et al
as 22-17018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY DEWAYNE WOODS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. HANSON, Correctional Officer, R. BELL, Chief Deputy Warden, RICH, Canteen Staff and others
Bell v. Odum et al
as 5:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Solomon R. Bell
Defendant:
Odum, Mr. Cox, Mr. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Hanson et al
as 3:2022cv05104
Plaintiff:
Barry Dewayne Woods
Defendant:
Correctional Officer D. Hanson, Chief Deputy Warden R. Bell, Canteen Staff Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Schrag et al
as 4:2021cv08217
Plaintiff:
Ryant Trimale Pratt
Defendant:
J. Schrag, K. Gisler, R. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hesse v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Lake County Detention Center, Donald R. Bell, Steven N. Eschenbacher and others
Plaintiff:
William Lowrey Hesse, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
