Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hawkinson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
David R Hawkinson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of Wisconsin, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lt. Wendorf et al
as 3:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
Lt. Wendorf and Sgt. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sapp et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Lt. Sapp, Sgt. or Off. Pittman, Sgt. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEDY v. CALDWELL et al
as 3:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
ERUNTA KENNEDY
Defendant:
Warden Antoine Caldwell, DEPARTMENT OF CORRRECTIONS, Sgt. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borges v. Boelter et al
as 1:2021cv00744
Defendant:
CO Edward Schultz, Joseph Boelter and Sgt Scott Hill
Plaintiff:
Hector O Borges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00341
Defendant:
C.O. Sabo, Sgt. Scott, Shan Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn LaFollette, Cameron Belk, Sr., Roderick Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Shan Collins, C.O. Reed, Sgt. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Miller, Terrell Amerson, Paul Donley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Richardson et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Pooler, Officer Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Takaeus Makeon Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLARY v. SHUMAN et al
as 1:2018cv00959
Defendant:
MARK SHUMAN, SGT SCOTT and MS. JERALD
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2018cv00082
Defendant:
Warden Billy Wicker, MS IRWIN, Lt. Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Shaw and Christopher Jason Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
