Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smith v. Sheriff Honsal
as 3:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Ryan Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff Honsal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Humboldt County Sheriff's Office Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Ryan Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Humboldt County Sheriff's Office Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Antioch Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv05800
Plaintiff:
Ramello D. Randle
Defendant:
Antioch Police Department, Officer Thomas Smith, Officer Brock Marcotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wendrick et al
as 2:2023cv01176
Plaintiff:
Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Shelby Wendrick, FPS Eiting and Justin Segerstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA D. GRAHAM
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER, RICHARD K. DOTSON, MORIS RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. SMITH
as 5:2019cv00370
Plaintiff:
DAVID KEITH GREEN
Defendant:
SHERIFF THOMAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANTY v. SMITH et al
as 5:2019cv00175
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, MAJOR MARK MCGRATH and SHERIFF THOMAS SMITH
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEE CANTY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2018cv00346
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
CORIZEN MEDICAL GROUP INC, A MARTINEZ, A ACOSTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Florida, Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Smith
Defendant:
State of Florida, Dept. of Corrections, Brevard County and Corizen Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHETSTONE v. WROBEL et al
as 5:2016cv00448
Plaintiff:
VINCENT WHETSTONE
Defendant:
PETER WROBEL, JANE DOE and THOMAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
