Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dearing v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, The Great State of Mississippi c/o Jim Hood and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGELS v. EVERYONE AT TYNDALL A.F.B. FL FROM 08 JULY, 83 TO APRIL 89 et al
as 4:2018cv00040
Defendant:
ALL FEDERAL + STATE+ COUNTY JUDGES WHO VIOLATED MY U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM 13 JAN, 1989 TO PRESENT, ALL PASTORS + PRIESTS IN THIS COUNTRY FROM 12/29/62 TO, ALL RETIRED U.S. POSTAL EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST PAGELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Wynn v. U.S. Postal Service, et al
as 17-12268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY M. WYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, CLERK OF COURT and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gay v. The State of GA et al
as 1:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Sammy Levi Gay
Defendant:
The State of GA, The State of VA, The White House Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corr, et al
as 13-14642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN KYLE LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
James Nelson v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 11-15772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and others
Taurice Crisp v. Pasquotank Mail Room
as 11-6932
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAURICE M. CRISP, H. Tarnell Boo Boo Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
PASQUOTANK MAIL ROOM, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL, JEANETTE HARRISON and others
Defendant:
ALEXANDER B. DENSON, Magistrate Judge and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
James Nelson v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 11-13302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
