Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith #443755 v. Hunt
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Fredricks Smith #443755
Defendant:
Unknown Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardesty v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan Hardesty, II
Defendant:
Unknown Gutierrez, United States Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Perkins v. Tunner et al
as 5:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown, Unknown Hunt, Unknown Dixion and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Perkins
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Management Training & Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Captain Unknown Taylor, Management Training & Corporation, Sgt. Unknown Hunt and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jarmaine Alexander Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Juneau et al
as 3:2019cv00371
Plaintiff:
Dominique Lamar Rivers
Defendant:
Unknown Thompson, Unknown Hunt, Unknown Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. East Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2015cv00589
Plaintiff:
Roderick Freeman
Defendant:
East Mississippi Correctional Facility, N. Hogans, Unknown McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kohn #393687 v. Myron et al
as 2:2014cv00137
Plaintiff:
Floyd E. Kohn #393687
Defendant:
Unknown Myron, Unknown Lindenmuth, Unknown Jurnnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala v. Apker et al
as 4:2012cv00770
Plaintiff:
Miguel David Ayala
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Christopher Lamb, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cage #244367 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Harold Winfield Cage #244367
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Richard Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
