Cases 1 - 10 of 242
Booker v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50344
Defendant:
William Bruno, Mirella Susnjar, Jane Marinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Wright v. Granville County
as 24-1389
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. WRIGHT, Administrator of the Estate of Chad E. Price
Defendant:
GRANVILLE COUNTY, SHERIFF BRINDELL B. WILKINS, JR., CHARLES ROYSTER NOBLIN, JR. and others
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Chiles v. Domanick Smith
as 24-6354
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CHILES
Defendant:
DOMANICK D. SMITH, Assistant Unit Manager, CROMER HAIGLER, MACEO WILKINS and others
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Erby Dean Jackson, Jr., Moshe Ariel Israel and Moshe Aryeh Israel
Defendant:
Burl Cain, James Wilkins, Michael Dright and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wickins v. Mueller
as 9:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wilkins
Defendant:
Steve Mueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
O'QUINN v. VICE et al
as 4:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M O'QUINN
Defendant:
VICE, N OLDS, GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 8:2023cv02436
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Major R. Thomas, Captain Schmidtgall, Sergeant John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODARD v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
STEVE LAVON J WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
SMITH, GRIFFIN, BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
