Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Hall v. Scott et al
as 4:2020cv04009
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Jeremie Seymour, C Parsons and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Scott et al
as 4:2019cv04230
Defendant:
. Frazier, C Blakley, . Mofit and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Lodge et al
as 4:2019cv04228
Defendant:
J Howeter, Paula Lodge, A Hofmeister and others
Plaintiff:
An'dre Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miguel v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director et al
as 5:2019cv00199
Plaintiff:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant:
David Bowers, Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director, Tamra Dewbre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Jumper et al
as 4:2019cv04196
Defendant:
Jody Howerter, . Driscoll, Shan Jumper and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Roth et al
as 4:2017cv04329
Plaintiff:
Adam Hall
Defendant:
Judy Roth, Amy Hofmeifter and Alexis Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Sauk Rapids Police Dept. et al
as 0:2017cv05395
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lee Adams
Defendant:
Sauk Rapids Police Dept., Saint Clound Police Dept., Benton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Barksdale v. Joseph Joyce, et al
as 17-1863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BARKSDALE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH JOYCE, Judge, JACQULINE BUCK, PhD., DAVID SUIRE, PhD. and others
Russell Tinsley v. Merrill Main, et al
as 16-3320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL TINSLEY, and on behalf of residents at STU in similar situation problems, et
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL MAIN, STU Clinical Director, SHERRY YATES, Department of Corrections, SHANTAY BRAIM ADAMS, Unit Director and others
Welch v. Scaturo et al
as 8:2016cv02313
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Welch
Defendant:
Holly Scaturo, Kimberly Poholchuk, Cynthia Helff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
