Cases 11 - 20 of 51
ESPEJO-DAVILA v. TRUMP et al
as 4:2020cv01593
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, WILLIAM O'BRYANT, Chad Wolf and others
Petitioner:
JEAN CARLO ESPEJO-DAVILA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golding v. Trump et al
as 4:2020cv01323
Plaintiff:
Karim Golding
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Giron v. Trump et al
as 4:2020cv01322
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Giron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHERPA v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02443
Defendant:
WILLIAM O'BRYANT, MATTHEW ALBENCE, CHAD WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
DAWA SHERPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESPEJO-DAVILA v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02442
Defendant:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, CHAD WOLF, DIANNE WITTE and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN CARLO ESPEJO-DAVILA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golding v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv06998
Plaintiff:
Karim Golding
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Giron v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv06995
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Giron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Santos Garcia et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv00821
Defendant:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement, Jeffrey Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Santos Salvador Bolanos Hernandez, Ismael Castillo Gutierrez, Gerson Amilcar Perez Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armas v. Ramos et al
as 6:2020cv00741
Defendant:
Field Office Directo Diane L Witte, Warden Indalecio Ramos, Matthew Albence and others
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Johanna Corzo Armas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
v. Mansaray et al
as 1:2020cv01303
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jack Kavanaugh, Alpha Ibrahim Bah Mansaray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
