Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Thayer v. Howard et al
as 5:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
David W. Thayer
Defendant:
Laura Howard, Lindsey Dinkel, Christine Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daywitt v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daywitt
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Douglas Latuseck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv05578
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Commissioner Tyrone Oliver, Randy Sauls and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Network for Victim Recovery of DC (NVRDC) and ACLU of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debolt v. Linder et al
as 2:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
George Debolt
Defendant:
Linder, Cardenas, Fenech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frick v. Spiess, et al
as 1:2021cv00959
Defendant:
Charles Rees Brown, Federal Bureau Investigation, Michael Newsome and others
Plaintiff:
John E. Frick
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Judah v. Ovsak et al
as 0:2021cv00618
Defendant:
Joseph Witz, Nicole Oachs, Terrance Kneisel and others
Plaintiff:
Willim Judah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kunkel et al
as 4:2020cv04278
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare Inc., Shan Jumper, Jeremie Seymour and others
Plaintiff:
Terry C Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Doe et al
as 4:2020cv04248
Defendant:
C Parsons, John Doe, Jane Doe, III and others
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salinas v. Hirachen et al
as 0:2020cv02245
Defendant:
Kathy J. Harowski, Jeannie Clark, Mike R. Sander and others
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv04200
Defendant:
Dr Shan Jumper, Christina Woods, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Terry L Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
