Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Dushan Nickolich, II v. Shanda Payne, et al
as 22-15152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSHAN STEPHAN NICKOLICH II
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANDA PAYNE, Administrative Director, DAVE YOUNG, Health Program Manager III and ALMA MANCILLA
Windeknecht v. Easter et al
as 4:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Windeknecht
Defendant:
Dave Easter and Jarrod Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prouty v. Johnson et al
as 0:2021cv02438
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
Nancy Johnson, Jodi Harpstead, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickolich v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv01702
Plaintiff:
Dushan Stephan Nickolich, II
Defendant:
Shanda Payne, Dave Young and Alma Mancilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. DHS-MSOP employees et al.
as 0:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, Nicole Kielty, Jessica Joyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Joyal et al
as 0:2021cv01847
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
D.H.S.-M.S.O.P, DHS-MSOP employees, Brooke Ness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickolich v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv01112
Defendant:
Dave Young, Alma Mancilla and Shanda Payne
Plaintiff:
Dushan Stephan Nickolich, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baron-St. Laurent v. Morrison Health Food Service et al
as 2:2021cv00837
Defendant:
Dave Young, Aaron Bowen, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rene Baron-St. Laurent, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bean v. Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center et al
as 2:2020cv01345
Defendant:
Alexandra Coker, Sheridyn Miller, Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center and others
Plaintiff:
David Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2019cv04157
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
. Clark, . Hammers, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
