Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Martinez et al v. Ramen Meijin Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07214
Defendant:
Ramen Meijin Inc. doing business as Meijin Ramen, Dee Jing, Inc. doing business as Kuu Ramen, Aroy Dee and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Gloria Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Staub et al v. Herb & Dee's Break Room Social Club, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
Morgan Jones and Kori Staub
Defendant:
Herb & Dee's Break Room Social Club, Inc., Herbert M. Wilburn and Deidre Bockmon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Panora v. Deenora Corp et al
as 1:2019cv07267
Defendant:
Deeran Arabian, Dee Arabian, Deenora Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Panora
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Guerrero v. Danny's Furniture Inc et al
as 1:2019cv07284
Defendant:
Danny's Furniture II Inc, Dee & Dee Discount Store Inc, In & Out Furniture Store Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Wilife Vrena De Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Blackwell v. Gulf Coast Express Carriers, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00433
Plaintiff:
Dee Blackwell
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Express Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Basurto Gabino et al v. Pee Dee Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv04523
Plaintiff:
Estolfo Basurto Gabino
Defendant:
Dong Yung Chu, Pee Dee Corp., Eun Sook Chu and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FLOWERS v. WIESNETH LAW OFFICES, P.C.
as 2:2018cv00328
Defendant:
WIESNETH LAW OFFICES, P.C.
Plaintiff:
DEE ANN FLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DRAGO v. DB SCHENKER, INC.
as 3:2018cv04980
Plaintiff:
DEE DRAGO
Defendant:
DB SCHENKER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DRAGO v. DB SCHENKER, INC.
as 2:2018cv04980
Plaintiff:
DEE DRAGO
Defendant:
DB SCHENKER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Silguero v. Metropcs Texas, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dee Dee Silguero
Defendant:
METROPCS Texas, LLC , HBCC Investments, Inc. , BKCR, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
