Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Shannon v. Nike, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02848
Defendant:
Adecco, USA, Inc. and Nike, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randall Shannon
Camillone v. Adecco USA, Inc et al
as 6:2020cv01579
Plaintiff:
JUDE CAMILLONE
Defendant:
GROCERY DELIVERY E-SERVICES USA INC doing business as HelloFresh, ADECCO USA, INC, Grocery Delivery E-Service USA, Inc. doing business as HelloFresh and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morris-Stokes v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03270
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leara Morris-Stokes
Quinones v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00114
Plaintiff:
Alexis Quinones
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Farley v. Adecco USA, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01185
Defendant:
Restaurant Revolution Technologies, Inc., Adecco USA Inc, Restaurant Revolution Technologies, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Farley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv00286
Plaintiff:
Adrian Smith
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Bank of America Corporation and Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jeams v. Trillium Driver Solutions, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv60961
Plaintiff:
Bernabel Jeams
Defendant:
Trillium Driver Solutions, Inc. , Midwest Construction Services, Inc , Adecco USA, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Parets v. Special Counsel, Inc. and Adecco USA, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01289
Plaintiff:
Tony Parets
Defendant:
Special Counsel, Inc. and Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bobbi-Jo Smiley v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co
as 14-4583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBI-JO SMILEY, AMBER BLOW and KELSEY TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO and ADECCO USA INC
HAINES v. ADECCO USA, INC
as 1:2013cv00689
Defendant:
ADECCO USA, INC
Plaintiff:
PAULA K. HAINES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
