Cases 11 - 20 of 131
SAUERS v. NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv06502
Plaintiff:
CHERYL SAUERS
Defendant:
NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC., CHRISTOPHER WHITE and ELLEN FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Aimee Erwin v. Honda North America, Inc.
as 22-3823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AIMEE ERWIN
Defendant / Appellee:
HONDA NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Graybeal v. Shiroki North America, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Richard Graybeal
Defendant:
Shiroki North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Lumpkin v. Felician Sisters of North America, Inc.
as 2:2022cv12055
Plaintiff:
Deanna Lumpkin
Defendant:
Felician Sisters of North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bixby v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Adam Bixby
Defendant:
Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Leave Act
Harden v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
Harold Harden
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc and Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Bakara v. Interbond Corp. of America Inc.
as 9:2021cv82080
Plaintiff:
Gessica Bakara
Defendant:
Interbond Corp. of America Inc d/b/a Brandsmart U.S.A. and Interbond Corp. of America Inc. doing business as BrandsMart U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Bakara v. Interbond Corp. of America Inc d/b/a Brandsmart, U.S.A.
as 9:2021cv82078
Plaintiff:
Gessica Bakara
Defendant:
Interbond Corp. of America Inc d/b/a Brandsmart, U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Jennings v. Yamada North America, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
Brenda Jennings
Defendant:
Yamada North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Okafor v. Infuserve America, Inc.
as 8:2021cv02007
Plaintiff:
Tonya Okafor
Defendant:
Infuserve America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
