Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Click et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Brian Click, Harvey Ferran, Nicholas Ingrodi and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Dalton v. Intertape Polymer Corp., Inc.
as 3:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Brad Dalton
Defendant:
Intertape Polymer Corp., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Stephens v. Occupational Health Centers of the Southwest, P.A. (TX)
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Brad Stephens
Defendant:
Occupational Health Centers of the Southwest, P.A. (TX)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hughes v. Lancaster County Nebraska et al
as 4:2022cv03228
Plaintiff:
John Hughes
Defendant:
Lancaster County Nebraska, Brad Johnson and Barb McIntyre
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hurlow v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04049
Plaintiff:
Darryl Hurlow
Defendant:
Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Nathan Lindstrom, Brad Anderson and others
Van Meter v. Ingersoll-Rand Company
as 6:2019cv03480
Plaintiff:
Brad Van Meter
Defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Goodpasture v. Automated Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Curtis L Goodpasture
Defendant:
Automated Systems, Inc. and Brad R Perry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Boyer v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00372
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T, Inc., Jaime Benavides and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Etta Boyer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Smith v. Mahomes et al
as 1:2017cv07360
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Smith
Defendant:
Tonya Mahomes, Jerusha Stewart, Brad Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kaehn v. Brunswick Corporation
as 0:2017cv04311
Plaintiff:
Brad Kaehn
Defendant:
Brunswick Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
