Cases 1 - 10 of 397
Bartol v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robert Bartol
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
McCoy v. Darlington, City of
as 4:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
Hailey McCoy
Defendant:
Darlington, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Wheeling v. City of Winchester
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wheeling
Defendant:
City of Winchester
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family and Medical Leave Act
Wasserman v. New York City Department of Education et al
as 1:2024cv01719
Plaintiff:
Julianna Wasserman
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and John/Jane Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Lindsey v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03483
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lindsey
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cameron v. The City of Cape Coral, Florida
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Bret Cameron
Defendant:
The City of Cape Coral, Florida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Goines v. The City of Ringgold
as 4:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
James Goines
Defendant:
The City of Ringgold
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Priddy v. City of Newton Falls et al.
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Pamela Priddy
Defendant:
City of Newton Falls, Julie Stimpert and Jeff Limbian
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Metz v. Hardeeville, City of et al
as 9:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
David Metz
Defendant:
Hardeeville, City of and Steve Camp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Smith v. City of Hapeville et al
as 1:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Freda B. Smith and Freda Smith
Defendant:
City of Hapeville and Richard Glavosek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
