Cases 11 - 20 of 140
Adam Armstrong v. Argos USA, LLC
as 23-1639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM ARMSTRONG
Defendant / Appellee:
ARGOS USA, LLC and ROBERT CHARLES KOCIAN
Castellini et al v. Skyline Chili, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Peter Castellini and Mary Ellen Castellini
Defendant:
Skyline Chili, LLC, Tina Smith, Adam Schacht and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Armstrong v. Argos USA LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Adam Armstrong
Defendant:
Argos USA LLC and Robert Charles Kocian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Custer v. Google LLC
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Adam Custer
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sicard v. Kirkland's Stores, Inc.
as 7:2022cv07180
Plaintiff:
Adam Sicard
Defendant:
Kirkland's Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ryder v. Vibra Hospital of Western Massachusetts, LLC
as 4:2022cv11273
Plaintiff:
Adam Ryder
Defendant:
Vibra Hospital of Western Massachusetts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 2021 Right to re-employment of inducted persons
Johnson v. Greenfield Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01909
Plaintiff:
Adam Johnson
Defendant:
Greenfield Holdings, LLC and Greenfield Employees, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Employment
Adam Gomez v. Metro Air Service Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04979
Plaintiff:
Adam Gomez
Defendant:
Metro Air Service Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Gomez v. Garza et al
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Cameron County Sheriff Eric Garza, Cameron County Chief Deputy Sheriff Robert Gracia, CAMERON COUNTY TEXAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
EXANTUS v. MANAGEMENT
as 6:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
ADAM EXANTUS
Defendant:
CFI RESORTS MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
