Cases 31 - 40 of 65
JACKSON v. AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv18986
Defendant:
AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Plaintiff:
QUANASIA JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. PACK et al
as 2:2019cv13959
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10 (fictitious individuals), ROI STAFFING OF MASSACHUSETTS, LLC, INC. TOLL BROTHERS and others
Plaintiff:
DANE PACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Woodhouse Ford, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00260
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Scott
Defendant:
Woodhouse Ford, Inc., John Does I-V, Woodhouse CBP, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Island-Mateo v. Hunt Military Communities Management, LLC
as 1:2019cv00276
Defendant:
Hunt Military Communities Management, LLC, Doe Corporations 1-5, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Island-Mateo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HELLER v. NEW PENN MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv05669
Defendant:
NEW PENN MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., YRC WORLDWIDE, INC., NATE HERBER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bodine v. Salesforce.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00004
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Salesforce.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kim Bodine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
PIERCE v. ARDAGH GLASS, INC et al
as 1:2019cv00571
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA PIERCE
Defendant:
ARDAGH GLASS, INC and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOPKINS v. ARAMARK FACILITY SVS
as 3:2019cv00472
Plaintiff:
MARK HOPKINS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10, ARAMARK and POINT PLEASANT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FIGUEROA v. HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00298
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10 and HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P.
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JOCELYN FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conway v. Premier Healthcare Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2018at01890
Defendant:
DOES 1-5, Inclusive and Premier Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
