Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Humphries v. Murphy Healthcare III, LLC
as 6:2011cv00325
Plaintiff:
Dewey Humphries
Defendant:
Murphy Healthcare III, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Raymond Plows, et al v. Rockwell Collins, Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01936
Defendant:
DOES and Rockwell Collins, Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael S Murphy and Raymond Plows
Arthur v. Murphy Company
as 1:2010cv03142
Plaintiff:
Ernest Arthur
Defendant:
Murphy Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Juan Rodriguez-Quinones v. Lehigh Safety Shoe, Co, et al
as 10-2192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN B RODRIGUEZ-QUINONES
Defendant - Appellee:
LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE, CO, a/k/a Rocky Brands and JIM MURPHY
Plows et al v. Rockwell Collins, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01830
Plaintiff:
Raymond Plows and Michael S Murphy
Defendant:
Rockwell Collins, Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray v. Murphy-Brown LLC
as 5:2010cv00891
Plaintiff:
John Murray
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cheryl A. Murphy v. Black Enterprise et al
as 2:2010cv04497
Defendant:
Black Enterprise, Does, Earl G. Graves, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Murphy
Helene Karpiel v. Ogg, Cordes, Murphy, et al
as 10-1603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HELENE KARPIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
OGG, CORDES, MURPHY & IGNELZI, L.L.P., THE FIRM, GARY J OGG, ESQ., SAMUEL J. CORDES, ESQ. and others
Murphy v. SAS Institute, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00311
Plaintiff:
Becky Murphy
Defendant:
SAS Institute, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
FleetBoston Financial Corporat, et al v. Alt, et al
as 10-1035
Plaintiff:
ROBERTSON STEPHENS, INC., FLEET SECURITIES, INC and FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERTSON STEPHENS GROUP, INC. and FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a/k/a Bank of America
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC E. ALT, MICHAEL BARR, J.J. BEAGHAN and others
Defendant:
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., in its capacity as an arbitration forum
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
