Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Department of Labor of the United States of America v. MCS Life Insurance Co.
as 3:2023cv01315
Petitioner:
Department of Labor of the United States of America
Respondent:
MCS Life Insurance Co.
Anderson v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06826
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Anderson
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Advance Publications, Inc., The Administrative Committee of the Advance 401(k) Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Beldock et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
Justin Beldock, Gordon Broward and Shaadi Nezami
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Board of Trustees of Microsoft Corporation, 401(K) Administrative Committee of the Microsoft Corporation Savings Plus 401(K) Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Moore et al v. Humana Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00232
Defendant:
Humana Inc., John Does 1-30, Board of Directors of Humana Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Russel A. Hohman, Kena Moore, Susan M. Smith and others
Petitioner:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Pizarro et al v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01566
Plaintiff:
Jaime H. Pizarro, Jerry Murphy, Randall Ideishi and others
Defendant:
Alight Financial Advisors, LLC, The Investment Committee of the Home Depot Futurebuilder 401(K) Plan, Financial Engines Advisors, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Steamship Trade Association of Baltimore, Incorporated - International Longshoremen's Association (AFL-CIO) Container Royalty Fund v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00794
Plaintiff:
Steamship Trade Association of Baltimore, Incorporated - International Longshoremen's Association (AFL-CIO) Container Royalty Fund
Defendant:
Riker McKenzie-El, Jr. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jones et al v. DISH Network Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
LaQuita Jones, Lateesha Proctor, Patrick Smith and others
Defendant:
DISH Network Corporation, The Board of Directors of DISH Network Corporation and Retirement Plan Committee of DISH Network Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Carrigan et al v. Xerox Corp et al
as 3:2021cv01085
Plaintiff:
Chris Carrigan, Michael Venti and Sylvain Yelle
Defendant:
Xerox Corp, Xerox Corporation Plan Administrator Committee and John Does
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Singh et al v. Deloitte LLP et al
as 1:2021cv08458
Plaintiff:
Rupinder Singh, Jeffrey S. Popkin, Joni Walker and others
Defendant:
Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee v. Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC et al
as 1:2020cv07606
Defendant:
Aon Investments USA Inc., Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC and Aon Hewitt Investment Consulting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
3Rd Party Defendant:
Robert Kolodgy, Michael Mizeur, John Giblin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
