Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Wisconsin Pipe Trades 401(k) et al v. TM Braden Mechanical Corp et al
as 2:2008cv00873
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Pipe Trades 401(k) and Kevin LaMere
Defendant:
TM Braden Mechanical Corp and Clifford A Braden
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Board of Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 93 U.A. et al v. Nadolna Bros, Co. et al
as 1:2008cv05154
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 93 U.A., Board of Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 93 U.A., Board of Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 93 U.A. and others
Defendant:
Nadolna Bros, Co. and Clifford Nadolna
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAVIS et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv01064
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. DAVIS, PAUL J. ABELN, WILLIAM S. ABERNETHY and others
Defendant:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
The Board of Trustees v. Escobar et al
as 4:2008cv02535
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees and The Board of Trustees
Defendant:
Clifford Gregory Escobar, Catherine Joy Escobar and Escobar & Escobar Concrete Construction
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Escobar et al
as 4:2008cv02557
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Cement Masons Pension Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant:
Clifford Gregory Escobar, Clifford Gregory Escobar, Catherine Joy Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Escobar et al
as 3:2008cv02557
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Cement Masons Pension Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant:
Clifford Gregory Escobar, Clifford Gregory Escobar, Catherine Joy Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Teamsters Union 25 Health Services & Insurance Plan v. Gilbrook et al
as 1:2008cv10731
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Union 25 Health Services & Insurance Plan
Defendant:
Paul Gilbrook, Paul Epstein and Epstein, Lipsey & Clifford, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fulghum et al v. Embarq Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02602
Plaintiff:
Faye P. Abbott, Judith R. Adams, Lois J. Ainley and others
Defendant:
Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association Sickness Death, Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company, LLC, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Embarq Corporation as Plan Administrator of the and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Reynolds v. Lafayette Life Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv13103
Plaintiff:
Clifford A Reynolds
Defendant:
Lafayette Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Control Management Systems Inc et al
as 8:2007cv00772
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Control Management Systems Inc, Clifford E Bailey, Daniel L Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
