Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Board of Trustees of the American Federation of Musicians and Employers' Pension Fund v. Las Colinas Symphony Orchestra, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02175
Plaintiff: American Federation of Musicians and Employers Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the American Federation of Musicians and Employers' Pension Fund
Defendant: Las Colinas Symphony Orchestra, Inc., Garland Symphony Orchestra, Inc., Symphony Arlington, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Garland v. Voya Services Company et al
as 1:2020cv03769
Defendant: Voya Services Company, ING North America Insurance Corporation and Voya Financial, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brenda Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garland v. The Snap-On Incorporated Retirement Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2016) et al
as 1:2020cv02895
Defendant: Snap-On Tools Company, LLC, Sioux Tools Component, Mercer Health & Benefits Administration LLC and others
Plaintiff: Brenda Garland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Atiram v. Phillips 66 Company et al DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:17cv3740. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:17cv3013
as 4:2017cv03740
Defendant: Phillips 66 Company, Greg C. Garland, Paula A. Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Zam Atiram , Jeffery Schweitzer , Jonathan Sapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Schweitzer et al v. The Investment Committee of the Phillips 66 Savings Plan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv03013
Plaintiff: Raul Ramos, Jonathan Sapp, Jeffery Schweitzer and others
Defendant: Sam Farace, John Does 1-10, inclusive and The Investment Committee of the Phillips 66 Savings Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff: Zam Atiram
Consolidated Defendant: Phillips 66 Company, Greg C. Garland, Paula A. Johnson and others
Counter Defendant: Kevin Mitchell, Jesse A. Stephan, Alex J. Shabet and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Smith v. Iron Workers District Council of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00368
Plaintiff: Deborah Smith
Defendant: Iron Workers District Council of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust and Garland Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN v. PINNACLE ELEVATOR CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv02799
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant: PINNACLE ELEVATOR CORP. and GARLAND WAYNE ADDKISON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Employee Painters' Trust et al v. CMAX, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01960
Plaintiff: Employee Painters' Trust , Western Washington Painters Defined Contribution Pension Trust , District Council No. 5 Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant: CMAX, LLC, Rufus Garland Price, Jr. and Maria C. Camilon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Health Care Trust et al v. Selco Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00666
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Health Care Trust , Sheet Metal Workers Pension Trust of Northern California , Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Supplemental Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Selco Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. and Garland Self, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
GARLAND et al v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2011cv00179
Plaintiff: AMBER GARLAND and ESTATE OF MARY J. URQUIZA
Defendant: UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?