Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bowers v. General Motors Company et al
as 1:2020cv00561
Defendant:
General Motors Company, General Motors Life and Disability and Sedgwick Claims Management Services
Plaintiff:
Ashley Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Toaster v. General Motors Company et al
as 2:2018cv10971
Defendant:
General Motors Company and Fidelity Investments
Plaintiff:
Johnny Toaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Gibson v. General Motors Company et al
as 2:2015cv07841
Plaintiff:
Carol Gibson
Defendant:
General Motors Company, General Motors Holdings, LLC, Prudential Financial, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Buchanan et al v. Delphi Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert Buchanan , Nancy James , Richard Katsma and others
Defendant:
Delphi Corporation, General Motors Company, Universal Fidelity Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
YOUNG v. BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN et al
as 2:2012cv03806
Plaintiff:
IZABELLA YOUNG
Defendant:
BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN , BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. , NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Dulaney v. General Motors Company et al
as 2:2012cv11867
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dulaney
Defendant:
General Motors Company and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Couture v. GM Company Health Care Program
as 2:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
Donald Couture
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and General Motors Company Health Care Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Moruzzi v. Motors Liquidation Company et al
as 2:2011cv11730
Plaintiff:
Bruno Moruzzi
Defendant:
Motors Liquidation Company, General Motors Company, Fidelity Institutional Services Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
