Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Tylor v. The O'Connor Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv00544
Plaintiff:
Vincent Khoury Tylor
Defendant:
O'Connor Corp., The, O'Connor Realty, LLC, James R. O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Miller v. Swift et al
as 4:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
Michael A Miller, II
Defendant:
Taylor Swift and Ella Marija Lani Yelich-O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jones v. Evergreen Trails, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00851
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Jones
Defendant:
Evergreen Trails, Inc., Francis Sherman, Christopher O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Raney v. Connor Group
as 3:2014cv00342
Plaintiff:
James Raney
Defendant:
Connor Group
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MATTERN & ASSOCIATES, LLC v. COZEN O'CONNOR, P.C.
as 2:2014cv02633
Plaintiff:
MATTERN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant:
COZEN O'CONNOR, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Historical Concepts LLC v. O'Connor et al
as 2:2013cv01542
Plaintiff:
Historical Concepts LLC
Defendant:
Julie O'Connor and American Vernacular Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bowen v. Paisley et al
as 3:2013cv00414
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Connor Bowen
Defendant:
Brad Douglas Paisley, Carrie Marie Underwood, John Kelley Lovelace and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Connor v. National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00954
Plaintiff:
Dr. Charles G. Connor, Jr.
Defendant:
National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Connor v. National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00569
Plaintiff:
Dr. Charles G. Connor, Jr.
Defendant:
National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
UMG Recordings Inc et al v. McPartlin
as 1:2007cv02308
Plaintiff:
UMG Recordings Inc, UMG Recordings Inc, UMG Recordings Inc and others
Defendant:
Connor McPartlin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
