Patent Cases
Alpha O Peptides AG et al v. Regents of the University of California On Behalf of the University of California et al
as 8:2023cv01758
Plaintiff: ALPHA-O PEPTIDES AG, a Swiss limited company, PETER BURKHARD, PH.D., Alpha O Peptides AG and others
Defendant: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE, a public trust, SUNOMIX THERAPEUTICS, entity form unknown, LBACHIR BENMOHAMED, PH.D and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stoett Industries, Inc. et al v. Irvine Shade & Door, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00835
Plaintiff: Stoett Industries, Inc. and Newline International, LLC
Defendant: Irvine Shade & Door, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Stoett Industries, Inc. et al v. Irvine Shade & Door, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01104
Plaintiff: Stoett Industries, Inc. and Newline International, LLC
Defendant: Irvine Shade & Door, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Irvin v. Onward Manufacturing Company, Limited
as 1:2017cv02625
Plaintiff: Andrew Irvin
Defendant: Onward Manufacturing Company, Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Lamar Advertising Company et al
as 2:2017cv00075
Plaintiff: Ultravision Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Lamar Advertising Company, Lamar Media Corporation, The Lamar Company, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Lamar Advertising Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00374
Plaintiff: Ultravision Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Lamar Advertising Company , Lamar Media Corporation , The Lamar Company, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tet Systems GMBH & Co. KG v. StemCells Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02056
Plaintiff: Tet Systems GMBH & Co. KG
Defendant: StemCells Inc., University of California Irvine and Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Peschke Map Technologies LLC v. Irvine Company LLC
as 1:2012cv01524
Plaintiff: Peschke Map Technologies LLC
Defendant: Irvine Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Boynton, et al v. Headwaters Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv01111
Defendant: Headwaters, Inc., Covol Technologies, Inc., James G. Davidson and others
Plaintiff: Philip E. Boynton, Clarence W. Boynton, Richard M. Boynton and others
Counter Defendant: Vincent M. Hamilton and Max Irvin
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?