Disability Insurance Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,660
CARTLIDGE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Scott William Cartlidge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff: Mary Elizabeth Williams
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Hubbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff: Nicholas William Hubbell
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Teat v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01468
Plaintiff: William Aaron Teat, Sr.
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff: Toby Edward Williams
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff: Jessica L. Williams
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff: Georgetta Williams
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff: Deborah L. Williams
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
KELLER v. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff: WILLIAM RAWLINSON KELLER, III
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Nanney v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02286
Plaintiff: William Joseph Nanney, II
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?