Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carnes v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Sonja Morgan Carnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv00404
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodrow Carnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Carnes v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv02557
Plaintiff:
Nicene Kemp Carnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carnes v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2014cv02557
Plaintiff:
Nicene Kemp Carnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CARNES v ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01073
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
NANCY H. CARNES
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Saghedejian v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00987
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carne G. Saghedejian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Saghedejian v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009at00428
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carne G. Saghedejian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2009at00427
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Carne G Saghdejian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CARNES v. ASTRUE
as 2:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. CARNES
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
