Cases 1 - 10 of 2,194
Brannen v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Laura Brannen
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Defendant:
Ivan Miller and Commissioner of SS Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hicks v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
James Neal Hicks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whitaker v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Alfonzia Whitaker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Whitaker v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Alfonzia Whitaker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hodges v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Jason Lloyd Hodges
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Whittaker v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Janesa Whittaker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Walker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Tarnisha Nicole Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jenkins, Misti v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Misti A. Jenkins
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Henke v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03841
Plaintiff:
Michael Henke
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
