Cases 31 - 40 of 160,211
Waxman v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01128
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Dina Waxman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dejesus v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv07037
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Juan Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Mayo Jr. v. Social Security
as 2:2024cv06547
Plaintiff:
Charles Mayo Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wright v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Kristin Marie Wright
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ECKERT v. OMALLEY
as 5:2024cv04907
Plaintiff:
MARY ECKERT
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Frank Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Engemann v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00568
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Engemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hansen v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hansen
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barnes v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02273
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA
Plaintiff:
John Westley Barnes, III
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wantz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01131
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Alexis Lynn Wantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
