Cases 61 - 70 of 1,867
Jamison v. Astrue et al
as 3:2012cv30227
Plaintiff:
Shalena Jamison
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gonzalez v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv10262
Plaintiff:
Adrian Torres Gonzalez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Loveland v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv02569
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Loveland
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lillquist v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv10206
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Jimenez Lillquist
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RAINEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01861
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RAINEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Acero v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00502
Plaintiff:
Salvador Acero
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Michael Patton v. Michael Astrue
as 12-3870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. PATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Johnston v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00617
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Melissa J. Johnston
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ramirez Jr. v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00498
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Alvino Ramirez Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Biron v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv06195
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lauren Biron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
