Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Fox v. Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv05715
Plaintiff:
Theresa B. Fox
Defendant:
Manley, Deas & Kochalski, LLC and Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ortiz v. U.S. Marshals, et al
as 7:2016cv00043
Defendant:
DEA and U.S. Marshals
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Ortiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Brooks et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01409
Plaintiff:
PAULA BROOKS and VIOLET V. BROOKS
Defendant:
MANLEY DEAS KOCHALSKI, LLC and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BONNER v. CIA et al
as 1:2015cv01168
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
CIA, NSA, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
R.J. Skye Foundation, LLC v. Rios, et al
as 5:2015cv00115
Defendant:
Rios, DEA Administator Michele M Leonhart, Geraldine Harris and others
Plaintiff:
R.J. Skye Foundation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gerst et al v. Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC
as 2:2014cv00993
Plaintiff:
Jessica Gerst and Brandon Gerst
Defendant:
Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stephen Handy Aguiar v. My Space Inc et al
as 2:2014cv05520
Plaintiff:
Stephen Handy Aguiar
Defendant:
Justine Couture, Drug Enforcement Administration, My Space Inc and others
Roa v. United States Department of Justice Forfeiture Counsel of the DEA
as 2:2014mc00473
Petitioner:
Vanessa Roa
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice Forfeiture Counsel of the DEA
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Louise Galati, et al v. Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC
as 14-3219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUISE GALATI and NICHOLAS M. BOZICKOVICH
Defendant - Appellee:
MANLEY DEAS KOCHALSKI, LLC
Dea v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Sheron Dea
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
