Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 329
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Court in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Fernando Nicols v. Minera Andina Del Sol
as 1:2023mc00545
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Court in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Fernando Nicols v. Minera Andina Del Sol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FIRST INSTANCE COURT IN CIVIL MATTERS NO. 28 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF NATALIO HUPERT
as 2:2023cv21429
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FIRST INSTANCE COURT IN CIVIL MATTERS NO. 28 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF NATALIO HUPERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Request for Judicial Assistance from Labor Court No. 1 in Quilmes, Province of Buenos Aires, Republic of Argentina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023mc80267
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from Labor Court No. 1 in Quilmes, Province of Buenos Aires, Republic of Argentina
Respondent: Meta Platforms, Inc.
Petitioner: United States of America
Request for Judicial Assistance from the National Labor Court of Original Jurisdiction No. 80 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Evangelina Cecilia Suarez v. The Coca Cola Company Co., Et Al.
as 3:2023mc00027
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the National Labor Court of Original Jurisdiction No. 80 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Evangelina Cecilia Suarez v. The Coca Cola Company Co., Et Al.
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Provincial Court of Zaragoza, Section Two, Spain, in ADICAE
as 3:2023mc80240
In Re: In Re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Provincial Court of Zaragoza, Section Two, Spain, in ADICAE v. Luis Domingo Neyra Rambau, et al
Not Classified By Court: Automattic, Inc.
Pueblo of Pojoaque, et al v. Biedscheid, et al
as 23-2149
Plaintiff / Appellant: PUEBLO OF POJOAQUE and BUFFALO THUNDER, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: BRYAN BIEDSCHEID, individually and in his official capacity as District Judge, New Mexico First Judicial District Division VI and RUDY PENA
Anderson v. General Motors Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv12372
Plaintiff: Dwayne Anderson
Defendant: General Motors Corporation, Mary T. Barra, Joshua Preister and others
In the Matter of a Subpoena Issued to the United States Attorneys Office for the Middle District of Louisiana in Case No. 22-125877; Division B; 21st Judicial District Court, Livingston Parish, State of LA
as 3:2023mc00152
In Re: Subpoena Issued to the United States Attorneys Office for the Middle District of Louisiana in Case No. 22-125877; Division B; 21st Judicial District Court, Livingston Parish, State of LA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
In re Request for Judicial Assistance from Court of First Instance on Civil and Commercial Matters No. 1 of the Judicial Department of Junn, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentine Republic
as 4:2023mc80228
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from Court of First Instance on Civil and Commercial Matters No. 1 of the Judicial Department of Junn, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentine Republic
Respondent: Meta Platforms, Inc.
Petitioner: United States
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO
as 2:2023cv17858
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re: IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?