Cases 1 - 10 of 99
DiFranco et al v. Jeff Couch's RV Nation et al
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Nolan R DiFranco and Alischa M. DiFranco
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC, Clayton Baker, Kyle Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
(PS) Gedell v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv02252
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Connie Nolan, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
John R. Gedell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Padilla v. Garland et al
as 4:2024cv00332
Defendant:
Ted H Kim, Merrick Garland, Jessica K Leigh and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ceballos Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
Hanri Marcell Surian Maroni and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and CONNIE NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
BOYTSOVA et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv02217
Plaintiff:
VALENTINA BOYTSOVA, ILYA BOYTSOVA and ILYA BOYTSOV
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, CONNIE NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Joseph Nolan v. Boston Medical Group Telemedicine Inc.
as 8:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nolan
Defendant:
Boston Medical Group Telemedicine Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wire Tech Inc v. Nolan
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Wire Tech Inc
Defendant:
David G Nolan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
Tanner v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Joelle Tanner
Defendant:
Nolan Jenkins and Lehi City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Out East Accessories Inc. v. Grace et al
as 1:2022cv03101
Plaintiff:
Out East Accessories Inc.
Defendant:
Dylan Grace and Martha Nolan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
