Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Widlock v. Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
as 1:2015cv06259
Plaintiff:
Debra Widlock
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Casey Blotzer v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, LTD.
as 8:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
Casey Blotzer
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates, LTD
Barzal v. Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
as 1:2009cv01958
Plaintiff:
Robert Barzal
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gourd et al v. Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
as 4:2009cv02397
Plaintiff:
Vicki Gourd and Mark Gourd
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Rodriguez v. Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
as 4:2009cv00218
Plaintiff:
Araceli Rodriguez
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plank v. Phillips and Cohen Associates Ltd
as 2:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
Brandon Plank
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates Ltd
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dollarhide et al v. Phillips and Cohen Associates, LTD. et al
as 1:2008cv03006
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Dollarhide and Joyce M. Dollarhide
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates, LTD. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brent v. Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
as 3:2007cv00504
Plaintiff:
Ivan Brent, Sr.
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schoenfeld v. Phillips and Cohen Associates Ltd
as 2:2007cv00550
Plaintiff:
Heather Schoenfeld
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Owens v. Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd
as 5:2007cv04031
Plaintiff:
Joe Owens
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
