Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2012cv02291
Plaintiff:
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition , Coal River Mountain Watch , West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , Meredith W. B. Temple and Robert D. Peterson
Intervenor_defendant:
Fola Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Tucson Airport Authority v. Goforth et al
as 4:2012mc00014
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Tucson Foundry & Manufacturing Incorporated, Arizona Board of Regents and others
Petitioner:
Tucson Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Sub-file of A-3-LDG Re: Petition to Modify or Amend Final Decree
as 3:1973cv00031
Respondent:
Lake Ditch Company, Sharon Winder Avery, Ann Rosevear and others
Defendant:
Nevada State Engineer, Kitty P. Rose, Avis E. Andrulli and others
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Fallon, City Of, Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, North Valley Holdings and others
Interested Party:
Distribution Only and Garry Stone
Special Master:
Chad Blanchard
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. , West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. and Sierra Club
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , Robert L. Van Antwerp and Robert D. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
State of Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al
as 09-5134
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
TYSON FOODS, INC., TYSON POULTRY, INC., TYSON CHICKEN, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant:
CHEROKEE NATION
Cross Mountain Limited Partnership v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2009cv01902
Plaintiff:
Cross Mountain Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack, United States Department of Agriculture, Tom Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Attorney General for Oklahoma, et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al
as 08-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. W.A. Drew Edmondson, in his capacity as Attorney General, FDBA W.A. Drew Edmondson and OFFICE OF THE OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. C. Miles Tolbert in his capacity as the Trustee for Natural Resources for the State of Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee:
CARGILL TURKEY PRODUCTION, LLC, CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., CARGILL, INC. and others
Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant:
TAHLEQUAH LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
RANDY ALLEN, BIG JOHN'S, CHICKEN CREEK VILLAGE STORE and others
Third-Party-Defendant:
JOHN E. ADAIR, JOHN W. ADAIR, VIRGINIA W. ADAIR and others
Third Party Defendant, Counter Claimant:
CITY OF WATTS
Intervenor:
ARKANSAS NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION and STATE OF ARKANSAS
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Movant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF DAIRYMEN and others
The Tulsa Metropolitan Utility, et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al
as 08-5021
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellant:
CLARENCE JONES and DEBORAH S THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TYSON FOODS, INC., COBB-VANTRESS, INC., PETERSON FARMS, INC. and others
Movant - Movant:
ARKANSAS POULTRY FEDERATION
Sierra Club v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 4:2007cv00608
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club and Sierra Club
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency, R David Paulison and William E. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Comm for High Desert, et al v. Guerrero, et al
as 1:2002cv00521
Plaintiff:
Committee for the High Desert and Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
Edward Guerrero , K Lynn Bennett , Kathleen Clarke and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Frank L Bachman , David Kinyon , Stanley M Lehmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
