Cases 51 - 60 of 928
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT et al v. REGAN
as 1:2022cv02243
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
MICHAEL REGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-8043
Petitioner:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION
Petitioner / Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Respondent / Appellee:
DEBRA A. HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, UPPER GREEN RIVER CATTLE ASSOCIATION, SOMMERS RANCH, LLC and others
DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv01853
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Intervenor Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Greater Hells Canyon Council et al v. Wilkes et al
as 2:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Greater Hells Canyon Council, Oregon Wild, Central Oregon LandWatch and others
Defendant:
Homer Wilkes, Glenn Casamassa and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-8031
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent / Appellee:
DEBRA A. HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, UPPER GREEN RIVER CATTLE ASSOCIATION, SOMMERS RANCH, LLC and others
Sierra Club v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club and Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Defendant:
Kent Hoffman, U.S. Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Department of the Interior
Petitioner:
Emery County Coal Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
ALLIANCE OF NURSES FOR HEALTHY ENVIRONMENTS et al v. REGAN
as 1:2022cv01606
Plaintiff:
ALLIANCE OF NURSES FOR HEALTHY ENVIRONMENTS, Downwinders at Risk, HEAL UTAH and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS et al v. REGAN
as 1:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS, CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, CLEAN POWER LAKE COUNTY and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
LUNT DRESSER et al v. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DEVELOPERS et al
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
JAY P LUNT DRESSER, SIERRA CLUB OF PORTLAND MAINE, SIERRA CLUB OF MAINE and others
Defendant:
DEVELOPERS OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
