Environmental Matters Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 85
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communicat., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2759
Plaintiff: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF ME
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GUILFORD TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., BEAZER EAST, INC. and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Honeywell International Inc.
as 9:2007cv81036
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Arizona, State of, et al v. Honeywell International, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01989
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc. and Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of and Stephen A Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communicat., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2255
Plaintiff - Appellee: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF ME
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Defendant - Appellant: DEAD RIVER COMPANY, ROBINSON SPEIRS, JULIE ANN MACMANNIS and others
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communicat., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2193
Plaintiff - Appellee: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF ME
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GUILFORD TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., BEAZER EAST, INC. and others
United States of America v. City of Woodstock et al
as 3:2007cv50145
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Defendant: City of Woodstock and Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
United States of America et al v. ACF Industries, LLC et al
as 4:2007cv01215
Plaintiff: United States of America and Missouri, State of
Defendant: ACF Industries, LLC, Campbell Soup Company, Cargill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
State of Maryland, Department of the Environment v. Honeywell International Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00724
Plaintiff: State of Maryland, Department of the Environment
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Honeywell International Inc. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development ("BUILD"), Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development ("BUILD"), Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development ("BUILD") and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Maryland, Department of the Environment, Honeywell International Inc. and Maryland Port Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. Agere Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00155
Plaintiff: United States Of America, United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant: Agere, Inc., Alcolac, Inc., Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
People of the State of Illinois v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. et al
as 3:2006cv50115
Defendant: Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc., Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., H Holding Corporation and others
Plaintiff: People of the State of Illinois
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Life Technologies Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant: Color Communications, Inc. and John L. Armitage & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?